For Engineering Teams

Code generation got 10x faster. Testing didn't.

Ito automatically tests every PR. No test writing. No infrastructure to maintain.

Get Started

hrs

per engineer per week on manual QA

>40

of post-merge bugs are discoverable with manual testing

10-20

of eng time spent on E2E test maintenance

You've underinvested in QA. On purpose.

Because the alternatives all have worse ROI.

Hire QA engineers

$100k+/yr

Adds headcount without adding shipping capacity. QA Engineers don't want to do manual testing all day. You've traded one coordination problem for another.

Build E2E infrastructure

2-3mo + 10% eng time

Playwright, Selenium, etc. Pulls senior engineers off product work. Creates ongoing maintenance burden. Tests go stale. Flaky tests erode trust.

Accept Slower Releases

Opportunity cost

Every extra day in the release cycle is a day your competitors are shipping. Thoroughness is good. Thoroughness that costs you the market is not.

What your team stops doing

Ito doesn't add work. It removes work that shouldn't exist.

"Who's testing this PR?"

No more Slack threads. No more waiting. Every PR gets tested the moment it opens.

PM testing afternoons

Your PM clicks through the same flows before every release. That's not product work.

Senior eng on regression

Your highest-paid engineers clicking buttons to verify their own changes. That's not leverage.

Post-merge fire drills

Bugs that could've been caught in 30 seconds become incidents that consume days.

What Ito Finds on PRs

Connect your repo. See what it catches before you commit to anything. No integration work required.

What you get

Ito runs on every PR to your connected repos

Visual bug reports with video and screenshots

Results posted directly to PRs as comments

Slack support channel with the founding team

Ready to ship faster?

Join 100+ engineers reclaiming their time.

Get Started